An alternative vision developed by architect David Peterson — a 20-year Swansea resident — offers a human-scale, historically meaningful proposal for the site. The Ontario Association of Architects has taken note. The City has not.
A redevelopment plan procured by the City and Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC), through retained planner Bousfields, that quadruples the original 154 units, and adds a shopping plaza with dedicated parking spaces. This vision was pre-packaged and presented to the community in two inadequate "consultation" events, despite being falsely characterized as community-endorsed.
Final chance to put a pause or stop to this disastrous situation as the former residents and entire community deserves better. Let Doug Ford and Mayor Chow know your views today.
On March 25th Council rubber stamped the TCHC Proposal without reviewing any of the relevant documents to ensure that they made an informed decision. It will keep the families who have been waiting to return for four years already, another four or five more as a result. The City can't secure federal funding without the full environmental assessment of the toxic soil is completed. SwanseaPark.ca can deal with it by being more respectful in its strategy and design and could be completed in two years AND get Federal funding through Build Canada Homes, and other programs . Call Doug Ford and Mayor Chow today. This website has the links to assist you.
In his newsletter of February 19, 2026, Councillor Perks (Ward 4) indicates intent to proceed to the Planning and Housing Committee meeting on February 26, 2026 — a committee of which he serves as Chair — despite the metric for legitimate Consultation not having been met.
This confirms that the Application is incomplete as currently submitted, and will not be complete until sufficient and timely Community Consultation is achieved.
The meetings held on September 22 and November 20, 2025, did not meet accepted standards for community consultation considering the significance of the proposed development. The process fell short of substantive engagement and transparency.
A model comparable to Waterfront Toronto’s community consultation framework, endorsed confidentially by a Senior City Planner present at the November event, would represent the appropriate standard for 21 Windermere Avenue.
A flyer, hand-delivered on November 14, invited residents within 120 metres of the site to an “Open House” at Swansea Public School. Canada Post delivery timelines were described as insufficient, leading to the hand distribution.
Councillor Perks selected the date of November 20 to align with the project’s schedule requirements and mark a procedural milestone.
The location and format proved unsuitable: the City was unable to secure an appropriate venue and instead used the school lunchroom. On the day, this space was unavailable as arranged, so potential attendees were directed to a basement hallway and children’s play area. Accessibility barriers — specifically the absence of wheelchair access via a steep staircase — prevented participation by several members of the public who desired to attend. The elevator was not working.
Inside, the environment was hot, noisy, and crowded, making conversation and engagement difficult if not impossible for most, and particularly for those with hearing and visual impairments.
A spontaneous Q&A followed, led by the Councillor in a narrow corridor, with City, TCHC, Bousfields, and vendor representatives positioned opposite attendees. There was no microphone, exchanges were often inaudible and the physical environment inappropriate.
Attendees described the event as “demeaning”, “cynical” and “disrespectful.” No formal meeting notes were taken and shared. Although staff reaffirmed that questions would be answered through follow-up channels, no subsequent public consultation with thorough documentation has occurred.
TCHC, as the site developer, began posting related reports — over 50 to date — including a Public Consultation Strategy Report. The report references surveys conducted by Bousfields, though participation levels are statistically insignificant relative to the size of the Community needing to be surveyed. The nature and quality of the survey is also problematic.
A flyer was delivered via Canada Post approximately ten days before an online meeting, presented as a Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) “Pre-Consultation,” held via Zoom from 6:30–8:00 p.m.
The listed contact email generated on the date responded with (typo retained):
“Hello, This is the Swansea Mews Emergency Operations Centre… If you ha an immediate life threatening emergency please call 9-1-1… For Swansea Mews matter inquiries, please leave your name, phone number, unit number and brief message. We will respond within 24 hours.”
The presentation was led by a Principal from Bousfields, the City’s retained planning consultant, with contributions from architects, TCHC staff, and other vendors. Attendance was announced as 55 people. Councillor Gord Perks participated, stating he had only just reviewed the proposal and found it “exciting.”
A chat function was active, but few attendees were permitted to speak. Many reported unanswered questions and difficulty processing information due to the meeting’s format. Attendees were assured that all questions would be addressed later; this did not occur, and no meeting notes were shared with those attending, or absent.
As of February 18, 2026, the City’s public checklist lists this meeting as taking place on September 24, 2025 (wrong date), and indicates that no Community Impact Study or service requirements assessment was deemed necessary.
In late 2024 and early 2025, the City of Toronto and TCHC approved plans to demolish the existing structures and pursue a 649-unit redevelopment — quadrupling the original 154-unit community — without community-wide consultation having taken place.
A heavy concrete ceiling slab collapsed in a bedroom, seriously injuring a resident. Independent engineering reports revealed a manufacturing defect in the original 1970s construction of the ceiling slabs that could not have been detected by routine inspections.
The Chief Building Official issued an Emergency Order in June 2022, leading to the immediate and indefinite relocation of all 114 families to temporary housing. All 108 households displaced in 2022 maintain a formal right to return to the new RGI units once completed.
All documents and analysis relating to the 21 Windermere redevelopment, organized by type.
A social housing complex at 21 Windermere Avenue in Toronto's Swansea neighbourhood. A ceiling collapsed in May 2022, displacing 108 families who have lived in temporary TCHC accommodation ever since — nearly four years.
TCHC wants to replace the original low-rise townhouses with a 35-storey tower and a 20-storey building — 649 units on a 5.24-acre site. The resulting density of approximately 73,500 people per square kilometre is sixteen times the city average and three times the density of the Bay Street Corridor.
This lands on top of approximately 1,920 private market units already approved at the same intersection and 1,200 more planned nearby — none of which triggered the infrastructure investment the neighbourhood still does not have. Not one study confirms the area can absorb any of it.
Five — and every one matters:
The City's website declared the application complete in November 2025. None of these are.
When asked — repeatedly — they rejected the proposal. Penny Fischer, speaking for the Tenant Leadership Committee at the February 26 hearing, was direct:
"We were not asked whether we wanted a 35-storey building or a 16-storey building or stacked townhouses. We were told what the plan would be."
She confirmed that the majority of tenants oppose the plan. They were never shown the Swansea Park alternative — a publicly available proposal known to TCHC and the Councillor since Fall 2024.
The Swansea Park proposal, by architect David Peterson — a 20-year Swansea resident and former TCHC employee — offers 14 mid-rise buildings of 6, 8, and 10 storeys, 60% green space, a naturalized central park, ground-level access at every building, mass timber construction, and cooperative tenure.
It satisfies the replacement housing obligation and was never shown to the community at a single consultation session.
No. Two "consultations" were held: a Zoom webinar in September 2025 whose notes were never verified by attendees, and a school-basement drop-in in November 2025 with five business days' notice, no amplification, no wheelchair access, and a broken elevator.
The urgency was justified by a federal funding deadline the local MP's office confirmed never existed. The Swansea Park alternative was not mentioned at either event.
Two of six members were absent. The Chair — Councillor Perks — had privately declared his support six days before the hearing. The five outstanding studies were not treated as a barrier. The alternative was never raised.
The vote was 3-1 for the towers, based on Councillor questions that were not properly addressed or honestly answered — as documented in the Forensic Q&A Analysis filed with this complaint.
A formal complaint process against Councillor Perks has commenced on six grounds:
The crisis is real — Toronto's Rent-Geared-to-Income wait list stands at nearly 105,000 households and is projected to reach 118,000 by the time this development would be occupied.
But the difference between the TCHC proposal and the Swansea Park alternative is between 188 and 318 units — less than 0.27% of that projected list. Meanwhile, the 649 units proposed land on a neighbourhood already absorbing 1,920 approved private market units and 1,200 more planned nearby — with no new schools, no upgraded transit, and no additional community infrastructure to show for any of it.
The crisis does not require this specific density on this specific site, and the neighbourhood cannot support it now, nor will it in three years.
The City's own hydrogeological study found contaminated soil and water with no remediation planned. The site sits on a former pond, landfill, and gas station, on a sand plain over a highly vulnerable aquifer.
No natural heritage impact study has been done despite the proximity to Catfish Creek and Grenadier Pond in High Park. A sinkhole appeared on Windermere Avenue in January 2026 — one month before the Committee vote.
Everything available: 1,001 verified petition signatures in two weeks, 19 deputations at the February 26 hearing, a formal IC complaint, and letters to every councillor, the Mayor, federal and provincial ministers of housing, CMHC, and the Ontario Ombudsman.
The community is not opposing housing. It is opposing density without the studies to justify it, towers without the livability to support them, and a process that withheld the alternative and locked in the outcome before the work was done.
Call Doug Ford 647-612-3676 and Mayor Chow 416-397-2489 today and write them too at premier@ontario.ca, and Mayor_Chow@toronto.ca. Returning residents deserve so much better!
What to tell Doug and Olivia when you call :
"Hi, my name is [name] and I'm calling about 21 Windermere Avenue, also known as Swansea Mews, in Toronto. Wednesday at 4:30pm is the Ontario Land Tribunal Appeal deadline, and TCHC is trying to build on land where their own scientists found lead poisoning at 30 times the safe limit for children, without secured funding, and without the environmental assessment the federal government requires before they will back it. There is a faster, cheaper alternative that gets 108 displaced families home sooner and cuts through all of this red tape. I'm asking you [Premier Ford / Mayor Chow] to file an appeal at the Ontario Land Tribunal before 4:30 today, or whatever you have to do immediately to pause this proposal and demand a proper review. Thank you."
And remember to text Doug too - he is a man of the people and encourages our input.
Add your name to the community petition demanding that a Record of Site Condition be undertaken immediately.
Sign NowThe survey is neutral and seeks to understand community experiences, priorities, and preferences.
Estimated completion time: 5–7 minutes
Complete the community form to receive updates, be notified of future meetings and consultations, and connect with the Swansea Matters network.
Complete the FormThe more people know, the harder it is to ignore community voices. Share Swansea Matters with your neighbours, friends, and local networks.
Residents, neighbours, and community members have documented their experiences with this consultation process. Their voices deserve to be heard before any decision is made.
SARA has formally expressed concerns about the scale and process of the proposed redevelopment at 21 Windermere Avenue, reinforcing that the community's right to meaningful consultation has not been met.
Read SARA's Position"Demeaning. Cynical. Disrespectful. Intimidating. Negligent"
Three words repeatedly used by attendees to describe the open house held in a school basement hallway — without functioning elevator access, adequate space, or ability to hear speakers.
Community Input DocumentComplete transcript of community deputations at the Planning and Housing Committee meeting.
Read Deputation TranscriptThe Swansea Mews situation has drawn significant media attention. Read the full picture.
Select a recipient, customize the message if you wish, then copy and send it directly to their email. Every message counts — elected officials pay attention when constituents write.
Originally owned by John Ellis, the 5.3-acre site was later used for automotive purposes and warehousing before residential development. One of the early ponds was used as a dump and filled with tailings.
Developed in the mid-1970s as 154 rent-geared-to-income (RGI) stacked townhomes in nine four-storey blocks. For decades it housed ~400 residents in a close-knit community, despite ongoing maintenance backlogs.
May 27, 2022: A concrete ceiling slab collapsed, seriously injuring a resident. An emergency order evicted all 114 families. A manufacturing defect from the 1970s original construction was found. All 108 households retain a Right to Return.
The following video documents the situation at 21 Windermere Avenue and the community's response.